BT beats landmark class action case, cleared of unfair pricing
Competition Appeal Tribunal dismisses first-of-its-kind collective class action against BT, having found it to be charging ‘excessive’, but not ‘unfair’, prices.
This article includes:
- Geographic: UK; US.
- Organisations: Ashurst; BT; CALL; CAT; City AM; Cleveland Public Library; Collective Action on Land Lines (CALL); Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT); Competition and Markets Authority (CMA); Court of Appeal; Factor Risk Management; Law Gazette; Mishcon de Reya; Ofcom.
- People: Justin Le Patourel; Mohsin Patel; Tim West.
- Themes: Competition Act 1998; Court of Appeal; Consumer pricing; Excessive pricing; Landline pricing; Opt-out collective action; Standalone fixed voice; Unfair pricing.
Register for free to continue reading this article
Join the TelcoTitans community and continue reading this article
By registering for a free account, you will get immediate access to the rest of this article, plus:
- Enhanced access to TelcoTitans with three free article views per month
- TelcoTitans Daily and Weekly newsletter briefings
“The detail is very good. Better than we get internally.” – GM, Vodafone OpCo
Want full access to TelcoTitans content? Check out our subscription options.